Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Campylobacter survival through poultry processing

Lesley Duffy
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Food Safety and Stability
CSIRO Animal, Food & Health Sciences
39 Kessels Road,
Coopers Plains Qld 4053,
Australia Tel: +61 7 3214 2055
Fax: +61 7 3214 2062
Email: Lesley.Duffy@csiro.au

Microbiology Australia 34(2) 67-69 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA13023
Published: 13 May 2013

Abstract

Australia has recorded around 100 cases of campylobacteriosis per 100,000 population, each year, since the mid-1990’s. Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli are recognized as the main species isolated from clinical cases. Approximately 30% of cases have been linked to poultry. Through poultry processing, from slaughter to packaging, the prevalence and concentration of Campylobacter can be reduced. Published Australian data on the effect of current processing conditions are minimal. Data from other countries suggests that the stages of scalding and immersion chilling can have significant impact on the prevalence and concentration of Campylobacter. Understanding the complexities of these processing stages (physical, chemical and microbiological) and their effect on Campylobacter species may lead to improved control during processing and hence improved public health outcomes.


References

[1]  Stafford, R.J. et al. (2008) Population-attributable risk estimates for risk factors associated with Campylobacter infection, Australia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 14, 895–901.
Population-attributable risk estimates for risk factors associated with Campylobacter infection, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18507899PubMed |

[2]  Wagenaar, J.A. et al. (2008) Poultry colonization with Campylobacter and its control at the primary production level. In Campylobacter (Third edn) (Nachamkin, I., et al., eds), ASM Press.

[3]  Berndtson, E. et al. (1996) Campylobacter incidence on a chicken farm and the spread of Campylobacter during the slaughter process. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 32, 35–47.
Campylobacter incidence on a chicken farm and the spread of Campylobacter during the slaughter process.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FjsVKksg%3D%3D&md5=e56b94a69e0ab88dde2ea4a95f9892bcCAS | 8880326PubMed |

[4]  Guerin, M.T. et al. (2010) The change in prevalence of Campylobacter on chicken carcasses during processing: a systematic review. Poult. Sci. 89, 1070–1084.
The change in prevalence of Campylobacter on chicken carcasses during processing: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c3kt1yisA%3D%3D&md5=08139c116a63293be7b4cd9f131a06cbCAS | 20371862PubMed |

[5]  Rosenquist, H. et al. (2003) Quantitative risk assessment of human campylobacteriosis associated with thermophilic Campylobacter species in chickens. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 83, 87–103.
Quantitative risk assessment of human campylobacteriosis associated with thermophilic Campylobacter species in chickens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12672595PubMed |

[6]  Duffy, L.L. et al. (2011) Survival of Campylobacter through the poultry processing chain. In 16th International Workshop on Campylobacter, Helicobacter & Related Organisms.

[7]  Sears, A. et al. (2011) Marked campylobacteriosis decline after interventions aimed at poultry, New Zealand. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17, 1007–1015.
Marked campylobacteriosis decline after interventions aimed at poultry, New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21749761PubMed |

[8]  FAO/WHO (2008) Benefits and risks of the use of chlorine-containing disinfectants in food production and food processing, report of a joint FAO/WHO expert meeting. http://www.fao.org/ag/agn/agns/files/Active%20Chlorine%20Report%20Version%20Final%20December%202009.pdf

[9]  Sakkaf, A.A. and Jones, G. (2012) Thermal inactivation of Campylobacter jejuni in broth. J. Food Prot. 75, 1029–1035.
Thermal inactivation of Campylobacter jejuni in broth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Park, S.F. (2002) The physiology of Campylobacter species and its relevance to their role as foodborne pathogens. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 74, 177–188.
The physiology of Campylobacter species and its relevance to their role as foodborne pathogens.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XhslSqtLw%3D&md5=636a41c97b018c65899fd526765562f1CAS | 11981968PubMed |

[11]  Wassenaar, T.M. et al. (1998) Evidence of genomic instability in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from poultry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 1816–1821.
| 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXislWlsL4%3D&md5=cd8d187be431966d15c575629e92bb8dCAS | 9572956PubMed |