Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

DSMZ: the European Union’s first Registered Collection under the Nagoya Protocol

Andrey Yurkov A , Hilke Marie Püschner A and Amber Hartman Scholz A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Leibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany

B Email: amber.h.scholz@dsmz.de

Microbiology Australia 40(3) 108-113 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA19030
Published: 17 September 2019

Abstract

The Convention on Biological Diversity and the Nagoya Protocol have created new challenges for international microbiological research. With the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in 2014, the European Union created a new voluntary legal mechanism, the Register of Collections, to help users of collections, including culture collections, have an easier path to Nagoya Protocol compliance by using a so-called ‘registered collection'. The Leibniz Institute DSMZ is the first, and so far only, collection to successfully be entered into the Register. The challenges and lessons learned during this process can be informative for culture collections and users of microbial resources beyond the EU and indeed around the world.


References

[1]  Boundy‐Mills, K.L. et al. (2016) Yeast culture collections in the twenty‐first century: New opportunities and challenges. Yeast 33, 243–260.
Yeast culture collections in the twenty‐first century: New opportunities and challenges.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27144478PubMed |

[2]  https://www.dsmz.de/about-us/nagoya-protocol.html

[3]  https://www.dsmz.de/deposit/nagoya-protocol.html

[4]  https://www.dsmz.de/about-us/nagoya-protocol/due-diligence.html

[5]  https://absch.cbd.int/countries/BR

[6]  Overmann, J. and Scholz, A.H. (2017) Microbiological research under the Nagoya Protocol: facts and fiction. Trends Microbiol. 25, 85–88.
Microbiological research under the Nagoya Protocol: facts and fiction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27887771PubMed |

[7]  Prathapan, K.D. et al. (2018) When the cure kills—CBD limits biodiversity research. Science 360, 1405–1406.
When the cure kills—CBD limits biodiversity research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29954970PubMed |

[8]  Bockmann, F.A. et al. (2018) Brazil’s government attacks biodiversity. Science 360, 865.
| 29798874PubMed |

[9]  Neumann, D. et al. (2018) Global biodiversity research tied up by juridical interpretations of access and benefit sharing. Org. Divers. Evol. 18, 1–12.
Global biodiversity research tied up by juridical interpretations of access and benefit sharing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Wynberg, R. and Laird, S.A. (2018) Fast science and sluggish policy: the herculean task of regulating biodiscovery. Trends Biotechnol. 36, 1–3.
Fast science and sluggish policy: the herculean task of regulating biodiscovery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28964595PubMed |