Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Embedding research ethics and integrity into undergraduate practical classes

Karena L Waller A , Daniel P Barr B , Paul M Taylor C and Odilia L Wijburg D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia. Tel: +61 3 8344 0045, Email: klwaller@unimelb.edu.au

B Office for Research Ethics and Integrity, Research Innovation and Commercialisation, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia. Tel: +61 3 9035 4170, Email: dpbarr@unimelb.edu.au

C Office for Research Ethics and Integrity, Research Innovation and Commercialisation, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia. Tel: +61 3 8344 2047, Email: pmt@unimelb.edu.au

D Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Vic. 3000, Australia. Tel: +61 3 8344 9919, Email: odilia@unimelb.edu.au

Microbiology Australia 37(2) 76-80 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA16025
Published: 18 April 2016

Abstract

The core principles of research ethics and integrity that underpin the responsible conduct of research are critical to the design and performance of high quality research that generates excellent research data and outcomes that can be confidently trusted. Although many senior researchers have gained an in-depth appreciation and understanding of the importance of research ethics and integrity in the responsible conduct of research, many undergraduate students in science and technology disciplines do not obtain a basic, working knowledge of relevant research ethics and integrity principles as part of their degree. Here, we describe the introduction of a research ethics and integrity curriculum component into our third year practical classes, and the beneficial outcomes that we observed.


References

[1]  National Health and Medical Research Council (2007). http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/r39.pdf (accessed 10 February 2016).

[2]  Begley, C.G. et al. (2015) Institutions must do their part for reproducibility. Nature 525, 25–27.
Institutions must do their part for reproducibility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhsVCis7vO&md5=56966b6959d3d21cf2d80f330d3fb162CAS | 26333454PubMed |

[3]  Shaw, D.M. and Erren, T.C. (2015) Ten simple rules for protecting research integrity. PLOS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004388.
Ten simple rules for protecting research integrity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26426757PubMed |

[4]  Alfredo, K. and Hart, H. (2011) The university and the responsible conduct of research: who is responsible for what? Sci. Eng. Ethics 17, 447–457.
The university and the responsible conduct of research: who is responsible for what?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20535642PubMed |

[5]  Kalichman, M.W. (2007) Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research. Acad. Med. 82, 870–875.
Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17726394PubMed |

[6]  Kalichman, M. and Plemmons, D.K. (2007) Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses. Acad. Med. 82, 846–852.
Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17726389PubMed |

[7]  Steneck, N.H. and Bulger, R.E. (2007) The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Acad. Med. 82, 829–834.
The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17726385PubMed |

[8]  Mahmud, S. and Bretag, T (2013) Postgraduate research students and academic integrity: ‘It’s about good research training’. J. High. Educ. Pol. Manag. 35, 432–443.
Postgraduate research students and academic integrity: ‘It’s about good research training’.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9]  Bretag, T. et al. (2014) ‘Teach us how to do it properly!’ An Australian academic integrity student survey. Stud. High. Educ. 39, 1150–1169.
‘Teach us how to do it properly!’ An Australian academic integrity student survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Heitman, E. et al. (2007) New graduate students’ baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research. Acad. Med. 82, 838–845.
New graduate students’ baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17726387PubMed |

[11]  Marocco, D.A. (2000) Biology for the 21st Century: The Search for a Core. Am. Biol. Teach. 62, 565–569.
Biology for the 21st Century: The Search for a Core.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Bowater, L. and Wilkinson, M. (2012) Twelve tips of teaching (legal and ethical aspects of) research ethics/responsible conduct of research. Med. Teach. 34, 108–115.
Twelve tips of teaching (legal and ethical aspects of) research ethics/responsible conduct of research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22288988PubMed |

[13]  Bulger, R.E. and Heitman, E. (2007) Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the University. Acad. Med. 82, 876–878.
Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the University.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17726396PubMed |

[14]  Irish Universities Association (2015) National policy statement on Ensuring Research Integrity in Ireland. http://www.iua.ie/research-innovation/research-integrity/ (accessed 15 February 2016).